
Commonwealth of Virginia
Office of the Attorney General
Jay Jones
Attorney General
202 North 9th Street
Richmond, Virginia 23219
804-786-2071
FAX 804-786-1991
Virginia Relay Service
800-828-1120
For media inquiries only, contact:
Rae Pickett
RPickett@oag.state.va.us
Attorney General Jones Opposes Unlawful DHS Rule Fast-Tracking Asylum Seekers into Removal Proceedings Without an Interview
RICHMOND, Va. — Attorney General Jones, as part of a coalition of 21 attorneys general, submitted a comment letter opposing the U.S. Department of Homeland Security’s (DHS) new rule limiting affirmative asylum applicants’ opportunity to participate in an asylum officer interview and explain why they cannot safely return home. The interim final rule (IFR) permits U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) to refer these asylum applications directly to the Executive Office for Immigration Review’s (EOIR), placing applicants in adversarial removal proceedings in immigration court. DHS estimates the rule could result in roughly 130,000 future affirmative asylum applicants being referred without an interview each year and could affect up to 444,000 cases already pending in EOIR’s asylum backlog. The IFR could further strain an already lengthy process for asylum claims, potentially leading to significant delays or case dismissals that would take an additional financial and mental toll on individuals and families navigating the asylum system.
“Asylum seekers come to our country in search of refuge from persecution, desperate to live freely. This rule cuts a critical step in the asylum application process and cuts the humanity out of an already overwhelming and exhausting system,” said Attorney General Jay Jones. “Silencing applicants from sharing their story moves us further away from a core principle of our country.”
The IFR pushes asylum applicants directly into an adversarial court proceeding, where an Immigration and Customs Enforcement prosecutor argues against their claim, with the denial rate reaching 94% in June 2026. Further, because immigration judges now frequently deny asylum claims without giving the individual a full merits hearing, many may not even receive a day in court at all. According to the Center for Victims of Torture, 44% of asylum seekers, asylees, and refugees in the U.S. are torture survivors, and the interview portion of the immigration process provides crucial time to explain why an applicant is seeking asylum, particularly for unaccompanied minors and applicants who cannot afford legal representation.
In the comment letter, Attorney General Jones and the coalition argue the IFR violates federal law and is particularly harmful for unaccompanied children, who under the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act are entitled to have their asylum claims heard through USCIS’s non-adversarial adjudicatory process, not EOIR. Attorney General Jones and the coalition further assert that the IFR:
-
Ignores the evidentiary importance of a non-adversarial asylum interview and does not justify departing from decades of policy;
-
Harms state residents by increasing the risk of detention and removal, disrupting employment authorization, and making legal representation even more difficult to obtain for many asylum applicants;
-
Will strain state-funded legal service providers, healthcare clinics, and immigrant integration resources, as well as undermine law enforcement interests;
-
Strips unaccompanied children of the non-adversarial asylum process Congress guaranteed them under federal law, forcing kids who often have no attorney to navigate an adversarial system built for adults;
-
Increases the psychological distress experienced by asylum seekers and their families, compounding trauma many have already experienced fleeing persecution;
-
Undermines tax revenue and business income, given immigrants’ critical role in the workforce and broader economy;
-
Abandons compliance with the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) by circumventing notice and comment requirements when the Rule went immediately into effect on July 28, 2026; and
-
Fails to consider reasonable alternatives, such as limiting the rule to future applicants, preserving interviews for unaccompanied children, or hiring more qualified asylum officers.
In sending this letter, Attorney General Jones joins the attorneys general of California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Hawai‘i, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Washington.
Published on: September 30, 2026
###